Co-mutation landscape and its prognostic impact on newly diagnosed adult patients with NPM1-mutated de novo acute myeloid leukemia

e18505 Background: 25-35% of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carries NPM1 mutation, characterized by aberrant cytoplasmic dislocation of NPM1 protein, which is generally associated with a favorable outcome in the absence of FLT3-ITD mutation. Indeed, for NPM1-mutated AML patients with different co-mutation profiles, identification of specific co-mutation combinations other than FLT3-ITD mutation is necessary for accurate risk stratification and contributes to identify the optimal population who may benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) during post-remission therapy. Methods: Eligible patients included newly diagnosed adult patients (≥18 years old) with NPM1 mutated de novo AML (M3 excluded) treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine for at least one complete course of induction therapy from October 2018 to December 2022. All patients received next generation sequencing (NGS) detection for diagnosis before treatment. Response was evaluated within two courses of induction chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were collected for endpoint analysis. Results: 178 patients were analyzed. Median age was 59 years old (IQR, 51-68). The co-mutated genes with a detection rate of ≥ 10% included FLT3, DNMT3A, TET2, IDH2, IDH1, PTPN11, NRAS, and WT1. The median follow-up was 26.2 months. Our results showed that in NPM1 mutated AML, co-mutations of IDH1, IDH2, and PTPN11-PTP domain were associated with favorable prognosis, while co-mutations of FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A were associated with poor prognosis. Interestingly, the adverse outcome trends brought by FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A co-mutations could be reversed by IDH mutation and PTPN11 mutations, respectively (Table). Besides, for NPM1 mutated AML patients combined with FLT3-ITD/ DNMT3A mutations, allo-HSCT after remission could significantly improve outcome ( P < 0.05), while similar results were not found in FLT3-ITD/ DNMT3A wild type patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that NPM1-mutated AML with different co-mutation profiles led to heterogeneous outcomes. For NPM1-mutated AML patients with adverse prognosis-related co-mutation combinations, allo-HSCT after remission may be a recommended strategy to improve outcome. [Table: see text]


Dear Editor,
Approximately 25-35% of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carries NPM1 mutation, which generally indicated a favorable outcome in the absence of FLT3-ITD mutation [1].NPM1 mutations are absent in clonal hematopoiesis, and have been considered as AML initiating lesions [2].Research on comutation characteristics of NPM1-mutated patients concentrated on FLT3-ITD, which has been suggested to hold a negative prognostic impact on NPM1-mutated patients by several large retrospective clinical studies [3,4].Besides FLT3-ITD, although there remains controversy, other high-frequency co-mutations such as DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, FLT3-TKD, NRAS, and WT1 mutations have also been pointed out to affect the prognosis of NPM1mutated patients [3,[5][6][7][8][9].Indeed, identification of specific comutation combinations other than FLT3-ITD mutation is essential for precise risk stratification and treatment strategy optimization for NPM1-mutated AML patients.Since allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is generally considered to improve the long-term outcome of most adverse-risk and suitable intermediate-risk AML patients, for NPM1-mutated AML patients, it is imperative to revisit the co-mutation profiles to determine the optimal population who may benefit from allo-HSCT.
In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed adult AML patients with NPM1 mutations (acute promyelocytic leukemia excluded) in our center diagnosed from October 2018 to December 2022, focusing on exploring the therapeutic and prognostic significance of co-mutation characteristics in AML patients with NPM1 mutations.Patients who received at least one complete course of induction therapy were included in the further outcome analysis.Table S1 provided details of induction chemotherapy.We evaluated efficacy after two induction cycles, unless patients achieved CR/CRi after receiving only one induction cycle or discontinued treatment.Response evaluation was performed according to the NCCN guidelines for AML (version 3. 2023) and was categorized as CR/CRi or non-CR/CRi (including PR and NR) cohort [10].Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time interval from treatment initiation until death due to any reason.Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time interval from treatment initiation to the occurrence of induction failure, relapse, or death, whichever came first.Diseasefree survival (DFS) was defined as the time interval from disease remission to the occurrence of relapse or death, whichever came first.The study was conducted in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University College of Medicine (Hangzhou, China, Ethics Approval Number: IIT20240304A).All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (GraphPad Software, CA, USA) and SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
One hundred seventy-eight patients (92.71%) received at least one complete course of intensive induction chemotherapy and underwent efficacy assessment, of which 133 patients (74.72%) achieved CR/CRi within two courses of induction chemotherapy.The median follow-up of the 178 patients was 26.23 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.31-29.16).The median OS and DFS have not been reached, with the median EFS of 15.03 months (95% CI, 8.25-21.82).The 3-year expected OS, EFS, and DFS were 51.5%, 40.3%, and 53.7%, respectively.
For patients combined with IDH1/2 mutations, we observed that the IDH1/2 mutant group significantly improved OS, EFS, and DFS compared with wild-type group (Median OS, NR vs. 18.6 months, p < 0.001; Median EFS, NR vs 10.2 months, p = 0.003; Median DFS, NR vs 18.3 months, p = 0.012) (Figs.2C-E and S3).Although patients combined with PTPN11 mutations showed a trend toward improved outcome compared with PTPN11 wild-type, the difference was not significant (Fig. S4).PTPN11 mutations have been reported to be mainly clustered in the N-terminal Src homology region 2 (N-SH2) and phosphatase (PTP) domains.Since mutations in both two domains involved in attenuating the autoinhibition of the protein, SHP2, encoded by PTPN11 [11], we further investigated whether mutations in different domains of PTPN11 led to comparable outcome.The OS and EFS of patients with PTPN11-PTP domain mutations were significantly improved compared to those with PTPN11 wild-type (Median OS, NR vs 26.0 months, p = 0.014; Median EFS, NR vs 13.5 months, p = 0.016).Similar trends were found in DFS, whereas patients with PTPN11-N-SH2 domain mutations showed no significant improvement in outcome (Figs.2F-H and S4).In addition, Fig. S5 showed the prognostic impact of other co-mutation genes with a detection rate of ≥10% in the follow-up patients, including TET2, FLT3-TKD, NRAS, and WT1, with trends all non-significant.
Further, we took into account the presence of IDH or PTPN11 mutations in NPM1-mutated patients combined with FLT3-ITD or DNMT3A mutations to explore the prognostic impact of the specific co-mutation interaction patterns.Separately, carrying IDH mutations significantly improved OS and exhibited an improved EFS trend in patients with NPM1/FLT3-ITD dual mutations (Median OS, 30.8 vs 12.8 months, p = 0.015; Median EFS, 22.6 vs 6.1 months, p = 0.099), but has no significant impact on the outcome of patients with NPM1/DNMT3A mutations (Figs.2I, J and S6).Similarly, carrying PTPN11 mutations significantly improved OS and EFS in patients with NPM1/DNMT3A dual mutations (Median OS, NR vs. 14.6 months, p = 0.026; Median EFS, NR vs. 10.2 months, p = 0.033), but has no significant impact on the outcome of patients with NPM1/FLT3-ITD mutations (Figs.2K, L and S6).
Previous research generally acknowledged that allo-HSCT is beneficial for FLT3-ITD mutated AML patients without NPM1 mutations.To identify the subgroup of NPM1-mutated AML patients likely to benefit from allo-HSCT, we explored the prognosis of patients who underwent allo-HSCT during postremission after achieving CR/CRi within two courses of induction.A total of 32 patients received allo-HSCT, with another four patients relapsed and received salvage-HSCT during postremission.For patients with NPM1 mutation, receiving allo-HSCT or salvage-HSCT did not significantly improve the outcome compared with non-transplanted patients (Fig. S7).For patients with NPM1 mutations combined with either FLT3-ITD or DNMT3A mutation, allo-HSCT showed a trend toward improved outcome, but the difference was not significant.When further focused on patients with NPM1/FLT3-ITD/DNMT3A triple mutations characterized by poor prognosis, we observed that allo-HSCT significantly improved the OS, EFS, and DFS of these subgroup (Median OS, NR vs. 14.0 months, p = 0.037; Median EFS, NR vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.014; Median DFS, NR vs. 7.4 months, p = 0.012) (Fig. 2M-O).Nevertheless, for NPM1-mutated patients with wild type FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A, administration of allo-HSCT showed no improved outcome (Fig. S7).
Our results indicated that in NPM1-mutated AML, co-mutations of IDH1/2 and PTPN11-PTP domain were correlated with favorable prognosis, whereas FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A co-mutations were indicative of poor prognosis.Notably, the presence of NPM1/FLT3-ITD/DNMT3A triple mutations is associated with exceptionally adverse OS and EFS trends.Several studies have reported NPM1/ FLT3-ITD/DNMT3A, the most common triple mutation pattern in NPM1-mutated patients, defined an AML subgroup with extremely poor prognosis [7,12], which aligned with our findings.Further, our results on specific co-mutation combinations indicated that IDH and PTPN11 co-mutations, respectively, ameliorated the adverse prognosis of patients with NPM1/FLT3-ITD or NPM1/ DNMT3A dual mutations, thus two subsets with improved prognosis were redefined from the original adverse-prognosis subset of NPM1-mutated AML.Besides, for patients with NPM1/ FLT3-ITD dual mutations, allo-HSCT post-first remission has demonstrated a significant enhancement in both OS and DFS juxtaposed with the continued administration of chemotherapy alone [13,14].However, another large cohort study on pediatric AML reported opposite results [15].Our research endeavored to identify the optimal population who may benefit from allo-HSCT.
The findings underscored the therapeutic potential of allo-HSCT, particularly for AML patients with NPM1/FLT3-ITD/DNMT3A triple mutations during post-remission.
In summary, these findings underscored the importance of comutation analysis in NPM1-mutated AML for risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making, suggesting that allo-HSCT may be a recommended strategy for NPM1-mutated patients with specific adverse co-mutation profiles.Nevertheless, further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore how these comutations interact to diversify the outcome of NPM1-mutated AML patients.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Landscape of NPM1 mutations in adult AML.A Protein domain structure and location of amino acids affected by mutations in NPM1.Several nuclear import and export signals of NPM1 assist its nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and cytological localization.The conserved N-terminal domain of NPM1 contains a leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES).The middle domain contains two nuclear localization signals (NLS) that drive NPM1 to move from the cytoplasm to the nucleus.The C-terminus contains a nucleolar localization signal (NoLS), in which two highly conserved tryptophan residues (W288 and W290) are responsible for the correct folding of the helix to stabilize the hydrophobic core of NoLS.Most of the insertion mutations in exon 12 led to the loss of the original NoLS signal and generated a new NES signal, leading to aberrant cytoplasmic dislocation of NPM1 protein.B Co-mutation distribution map of NPM1-mutated AML patients.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Outcome of NPM1-mutated AML patients with diverse co-mutation profiles.A OS and B EFS of NPM1-mutated AML patients with different combination patterns of FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A mutations.C OS, D EFS, and E DFS of NPM1-mutated AML patients with IDH1/2 mutation.F OS, G EFS, and H DFS of NPM1-mutated AML patients with PTPN11-PTP mutation.I OS and J EFS of NPM1 mut FLT3-ITD mut AML patients with IDH mutations.K OS and L EFS of NPM1 mut DNMT3A mut AML patients with PTPN11 mutations.M OS, N EFS, and O DFS of allo-HSCT on NPM1-mutated AML patients harbored both FLT3-ITD and DNMT3A mutations.